From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0125042589626456507==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christoph Hellwig To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] df387eae80: blogbench.write_score -59% regression Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20170203085904.GA27528@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20170203085140.GA5957@yexl-desktop> List-Id: --===============0125042589626456507== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:51:40PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > >do you also have numbers for the whole branch? Or should I reorder > = > Do you mean test data for 7f7bfe47 (xfs: wait for discards before retryin= g an allocation due to busy extents) ? > I'll need to check whether 0day bot has launched test for it or not. Actually the interesting number would be for 57c621ce ("xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards") compared to both the baseline and df387eae80 which was tested here. --===============0125042589626456507==--