All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: Question: PCIe DPC not allowing for link retraining and bus re-scan
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:52:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203205219.GE24601@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1FA01473@lhreml507-mbx>

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:35:47AM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > If my understanding is correct upon an incoming DPC event
> > the DPC IRQ handler will:
> > 1) stop and remove all the devices in the hierarchy under the
> > downstream port that raised the event
> > 2) wait for the data link to be inactive
> > 3) keep the downstream port status in DPC (in fact we set the DPC
> >    trigger status again here:
> >    http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-
> > dpc.c#L55)
> 
> As you can see above, after waiting for the link to be inactive
> we raise again a DPC event (according to PCIe3.0 6.2.10.1 we have
> DPC Interrupt Enable bit set to 1b and we set DPC Interrupt Status bit
> to 1b), also we keep the port in DPC status as we set also "DPC Trigger
> Status" to 1b. However this seems wrong to me as I would expect SW to
> clear "DPC Trigger Status" to allow the link to retrain and then to
> raise the Hot-plug event...
> 
> What do you think?

I think it's just fine as-is. These are defined as RW1C fields, meaning
write 1 to clear.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 11:56 Question: PCIe DPC not allowing for link retraining and bus re-scan Gabriele Paoloni
2017-01-30 16:14 ` Keith Busch
2017-01-31  9:35   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-01-31 15:53     ` Keith Busch
2017-01-31 16:59       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-02 23:22         ` Keith Busch
2017-02-03  8:26           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-03 10:35 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2017-02-03 20:52   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2017-02-04  6:29     ` Gabriele Paoloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170203205219.GE24601@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.