From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:19:27 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/15] nand: device model bringup on am335x evm and am437x gpevm In-Reply-To: <22033665-079e-3fc0-e062-576d56102257@ti.com> References: <20170131213717.30745-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20170206015651.GJ26129@bill-the-cat> <22033665-079e-3fc0-e062-576d56102257@ti.com> Message-ID: <20170207171927.GA26129@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 12:50:25PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 02/05/2017 07:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:37:02PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > > >> This patch seires adds nand uclass driver and enables omap_gpmc to > >> adopt driver model. This has been tested on AM335x GP EVM and > >> AM437x GP EVM. > >> > >> As preparation for introducing nand uclass driver the new API > >> get_nand_dev_by_index() was added to avoid direct acces to nand_info array and > >> u-boot core files were updated to use it. > >> > >> Patches can be found at: > >> git at git.ti.com:~gragst/ti-u-boot/gragsts-ti-u-boot.git dm-nand-v2 > > > > My conceptual concern here is that we need to address (as I've stated > > elsewhere) the need to get DM/DT support within SPL on these families > > (and yes, figure out what we'll do with respect to HS and the further > > size constraints) before we push farther down this path of DM/DT > > conversion as it's adding more #if/#else/#endif code that we need to be > > able to drop. Thanks! > > > > I understand your concern and see it's discussed now in [1], but I'd > like to understand how to proceed with this series. > > The original patches from from Mugunthan are at about 1 year old and > and it took me pretty a lot of time to just re-base them properly, > so will it be acceptable if i will re-send only patches 1-10 as they are > do not depend on TI SPL and will unblock DM conversation of other drivers? > Really want to reduce existed patch queue :( > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg237938.html We can take up some of the underlying patches now, yes. But we really need to do the DM conversion fully, in order to really unblock progress. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: