From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] block: Revalidate i_bdev reference in bd_aquire()
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:44:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170209124433.2626-4-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209124433.2626-1-jack@suse.cz>
When a device gets removed, block device inode unhashed so that it is not
used anymore (bdget() will not find it anymore). Later when a new device
gets created with the same device number, we create new block device
inode. However there may be file system device inodes whose i_bdev still
points to the original block device inode and thus we get two active
block device inodes for the same device. They will share the same
gendisk so the only visible differences will be that page caches will
not be coherent and BDIs will be different (the old block device inode
still points to unregistered BDI).
Fix the problem by checking in bd_acquire() whether i_bdev still points
to active block device inode and re-lookup the block device if not. That
way any open of a block device happening after the old device has been
removed will get correct block device inode.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 601b71b76d7f..360439373a66 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1043,13 +1043,22 @@ static struct block_device *bd_acquire(struct inode *inode)
spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
bdev = inode->i_bdev;
- if (bdev) {
+ if (bdev && !inode_unhashed(bdev->bd_inode)) {
bdgrab(bdev);
spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
return bdev;
}
spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
+ /*
+ * i_bdev references block device inode that was already shut down
+ * (corresponding device got removed). Remove the reference and look
+ * up block device inode again just in case new device got
+ * reestablished under the same device number.
+ */
+ if (bdev)
+ bd_forget(bdev);
+
bdev = bdget(inode->i_rdev);
if (bdev) {
spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
--
2.10.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-09 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-09 12:44 [PATCH 0/10] block: Fix block device shutdown related races Jan Kara
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: Move bdev_unhash_inode() after invalidate_partition() Jan Kara
2017-02-12 3:58 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-20 14:53 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: Unhash also block device inode for the whole device Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:16 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 12:44 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-02-09 15:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: Revalidate i_bdev reference in bd_aquire() Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:22 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: Move bdi_unregister() to del_gendisk() Jan Kara
2017-02-10 2:21 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-12 4:31 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] writeback: Generalize and standardize I_SYNC waiting function Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] writeback: Move __inode_wait_for_state_bit Jan Kara
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] writeback: Implement reliable switching to default writeback structure Jan Kara
2017-02-10 2:19 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-10 13:20 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: Fix oops in locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list() Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:40 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-20 16:58 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] kobject: Export kobject_get_unless_zero() Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:41 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 12:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: Fix oops scsi_disk_get() Jan Kara
2017-02-12 4:43 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-09 14:52 ` [PATCH 0/10] block: Fix block device shutdown related races Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-02-09 15:48 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-13 14:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170209124433.2626-4-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.