From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754111AbdBITNV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:13:21 -0500
Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:46198 "EHLO
        one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753310AbdBITNU (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:13:20 -0500
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:13:16 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel PT decoder switch case fallthrough cases reported by gcc 7
Message-ID: <20170209191316.GT26852@two.firstfloor.org>
References: <20170209165039.GA2488@kernel.org>
 <20170209182519.GR26852@two.firstfloor.org>
 <20170209190206.GA15066@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170209190206.GA15066@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> But what about my question? Do you think the changes are ok? I actually
> made all be fallthrough, i.e. considered that the existing code was ok.

Yes the changes are fine.

-Andi