From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] eeprom/at24: use device_property_*() functions instead of of_get_property()
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 20:58:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170209195859.GB1431@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486661768-21456-1-git-send-email-gardner.ben@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]
> Note: Matching the driver to the I2C device requires another patch.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg71914.html
Do I get it right? With the patch applied we won't have a regression but
the new feature will only be available when the above series is
upstream? So, it is a "weak" dependency?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-09 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 19:53 [PATCH] eeprom/at24: use device_property_*() functions instead of of_get_property() Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 0:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 15:27 ` Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 15:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 16:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 17:03 ` Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 17:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 17:18 ` Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4] " Ben Gardner
2017-02-09 17:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 19:58 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-02-09 20:31 ` Ben Gardner
2017-02-10 15:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-09 20:35 ` [PATCH v2] " kbuild test robot
2017-02-09 20:35 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-09 21:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 23:52 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-09 23:52 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170209195859.GB1431@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gardner.ben@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.