From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: cmtp: fix possible might sleep error in cmtp_session
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:43:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170211014247.GC101282@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485230871-22828-2-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:07:50PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> It looks like cmtp_session has same pattern as the issue reported in
> old rfcomm:
>
> while (1) {
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> if (condition)
> break;
> // may call might_sleep here
> schedule();
> }
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> Which fixed at:
> dfb2fae Bluetooth: Fix nested sleeps
>
> So let's fix it at the same way, also follow the suggestion of:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/628628/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> net/bluetooth/cmtp/core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/cmtp/core.c b/net/bluetooth/cmtp/core.c
> index 9e59b66..6b03f2b 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/cmtp/core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/cmtp/core.c
> @@ -280,16 +280,16 @@ static int cmtp_session(void *arg)
> struct cmtp_session *session = arg;
> struct sock *sk = session->sock->sk;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> - wait_queue_t wait;
> + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
>
> BT_DBG("session %p", session);
>
> set_user_nice(current, -15);
>
> - init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
> add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> while (1) {
> - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + /* Ensure session->terminate is updated */
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
>
> if (atomic_read(&session->terminate))
> break;
> @@ -306,9 +306,8 @@ static int cmtp_session(void *arg)
>
> cmtp_process_transmit(session);
>
> - schedule();
> + wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> }
> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
>
> down_write(&cmtp_session_sem);
> @@ -393,7 +392,11 @@ int cmtp_add_connection(struct cmtp_connadd_req *req, struct socket *sock)
> err = cmtp_attach_device(session);
> if (err < 0) {
> atomic_inc(&session->terminate);
> - wake_up_process(session->task);
> +
> + /* Ensure session->terminate is updated */
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +
Same comment about the barrier.
> + wake_up_interruptible(sk_sleep(session->sock->sk));
> up_write(&cmtp_session_sem);
> return err;
> }
> @@ -431,7 +434,11 @@ int cmtp_del_connection(struct cmtp_conndel_req *req)
>
> /* Stop session thread */
> atomic_inc(&session->terminate);
> - wake_up_process(session->task);
> +
> + /* Ensure session->terminate is updated */
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
And again.
But otherwise I think this looks OK, again with the caveat that I don't
know Bluetooth/CMTP that well:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> +
> + wake_up_interruptible(sk_sleep(session->sock->sk));
> } else
> err = -ENOENT;
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-11 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 4:07 [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: bnep: fix possible might sleep error in bnep_session Jeffy Chen
2017-01-24 4:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: cmtp: fix possible might sleep error in cmtp_session Jeffy Chen
2017-02-11 1:43 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2017-02-13 4:14 ` jeffy
2017-01-24 4:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hidp: fix possible might sleep error in hidp_session_thread Jeffy Chen
2017-02-11 1:26 ` Brian Norris
2017-02-11 1:26 ` Brian Norris
2017-02-13 4:16 ` jeffy
2017-02-11 1:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: bnep: fix possible might sleep error in bnep_session Brian Norris
2017-02-13 4:13 ` jeffy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170211014247.GC101282@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.