From: Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Atmel I2C TPM transfer length issues
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214023336.GC21340@lunn.ch> (raw)
Hi Jason
I'm hoping you can help me with an issue i have with an ATMEL I2C
TPM. I have one connected to an DLN2 USB-I2C bus controller. Initial
probe works, i can get the capabilites in /sys/class/tpm/tpm0,
tpm_version etc:
/sys/class/tpm/tpm0# cat caps
Manufacturer: 0x41544d4c
TCG version: 1.2
Firmware version: 66.4
But i have issues with pubek and other long i2c transfers:
/sys/class/tpm/tpm0# hexdump pubek
[11621.731960] i2c i2c-11: adapter quirk: msg too long (addr 0x0029, size 314, read)
[11621.738208] tpm tpm0: tpm_transmit: tpm_recv: error -95
The dln2 i2c bus controller has a transfer limit of 256 bytes. Getting
the pubek is doing a read for 314 bytes, which is getting rejected.
Is there any way to fragment the reads/writes? Looking at
tpm_i2c_atmel i don't see any. It seems the raw TCG commands need to
be passed in a single i2c transaction. The comment in i2c_atmel_recv()
suggests that multiple reads will always start from the beginning of
the TCG response. There are no comments in the send function, but i
guess an I2C start condition indicates the start of a new command?
Or am i missing something?
Can fragmentation happen at a higher layer?
Any other ideas?
Thanks
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-14 2:33 Andrew Lunn [this message]
[not found] ` <20170214023336.GC21340-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 8:39 ` Atmel I2C TPM transfer length issues Peter Huewe
[not found] ` <A6C9A409-4FF4-41A7-AE4F-0727B1464447-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 13:05 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <20170214130511.GA32480-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-14 14:06 ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-14 17:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170214023336.GC21340@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew-g2dyl2zd6by@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.