From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0C5DFE00985; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:28:03 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com (lelnx194.ext.ti.com [198.47.27.80]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F18E0095F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:27:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by lelnx194.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v1FKRwIB018834 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:27:58 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1FKRwjE014817 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:27:58 -0600 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:27:57 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1FKRviW021685 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:27:58 -0600 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:27:57 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Message-ID: <20170215202756.GB19009@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Commit notifications X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:28:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline All, With patches now often being merged to 4 branches (krogoth, morty, morty-next and master), the volume of automatic commit notifications is getting rather high... Do people think I should move those to a separate dedicated list off of main meta-ti list? -- Denys