From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CF477E00992; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com (fllnx209.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.16]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ADFE00970 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v1FL2BvW028519 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:02:11 -0600 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlemailx.itg.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1FL262P018889 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:02:06 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:02:05 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1FL25sL029956 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:02:06 -0600 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:02:05 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Message-ID: <20170215210204.GC19009@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: RFC: New dsp and gc320 entries for MACHINE_FEATURES list X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:02:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline All, I'm thinking about adding 2 new MACHINE_FEATURES flags (dsp and gc320) to corresponding platforms' configs. Those will be used to easily control and toggle inclusion of corresponding drivers and/or packages into the build. The idea is to use dsp machine feature in place of opencl one, as opencl really belongs to distro features... I'm soliciting feedback at this point. Thanks. -- Denys