From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/8] Add support for pipeline debug (dpipe) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:04:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20170216170446.GF17550@lunn.ch> References: <1487258564-3775-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, arkadis@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, ivecera@redhat.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:42125 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754770AbdBPREv (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:04:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1487258564-3775-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:22:36PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Jiri Pirko Hi Jiri, Arkadi Just to make sure we are all on the same page here: This purely RFC. It is not intended for the merge window starting next week? This is a new binary API, something we have to live with forever. So i think before it gets merged into a Linus kernel, we need time to think about all the different sorts of tables we want to dump, what sort of fields they have, and can we represent them using this API. That is going to take some time. Andrew