From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:10:52 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-02-16 In-Reply-To: <20170220145933.GQ12810@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <20170217072852.8329420B82@mail.free-electrons.com> <20170217211242.GC3470@free.fr> <20170220134111.1bc02a9f@free-electrons.com> <20170220145933.GQ12810@waldemar-brodkorb.de> Message-ID: <20170220161052.48208eac@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:59:33 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > I am not entirely sure, but can the reason for this be this patch we > apply on top of gcc 5.4.x > package/gcc/5.4.0/850-libstdcxx-uclibc-c99.patch? > > I think all failures relate to some C++ header failures. Can anybody > try with this patch applied? Indeed could be the reason. Worth checking before we apply tons of patches to individual packages. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com