From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: return errno -ENOMEM when exceeding RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220172558.3de0742d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AB11EE.4050905@iogearbox.net>
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:57:34 +0100
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/20/2017 04:35 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > It is confusing users of samples/bpf that exceeding the resource
> > limits for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK result in an "Operation not permitted"
> > message. This is due to bpf limits check return -EPERM.
> >
> > Instead return -ENOMEM, like most other users of this API.
> >
> > Fixes: aaac3ba95e4c ("bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs")
> > Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements")
> > Fixes: 5ccb071e97fb ("bpf: fix overflow in prog accounting")
>
> Btw, last one just moves the helper so fixes doesn't really apply
> there, but apart from that this is already uapi exposed behavior
> like this for ~1.5yrs, so unfortunately too late to change now. I
> think the original intention (arguably confusing in this context)
> was that user doesn't have (rlimit) permission to allocate this
> resource.
This is obviously confusing end-users, thus it should be fixed IMHO.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 15:35 [PATCH net-next] bpf: return errno -ENOMEM when exceeding RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-02-20 15:57 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-20 16:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-02-21 8:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-21 13:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-02-22 7:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220172558.3de0742d@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.