From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"ming.lei@canonical.com" <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
"zajec5@gmail.com" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"jeyu@redhat.com" <jeyu@redhat.com>,
"rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linuxwifi <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] iwlwifi: fix drv cleanup on opmode registration failure
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:32:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220173216.GD31264@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB3A8F4AD47@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 09:16:01AM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > This should in theory fix a detangled drv from the drv list should either of the
> > opmode modules loaded and handled registration for the drv.
> >
> > The path of having the opmode registration deal with the drv opmode start is
> > actually the more common path. The other path, from the async callback is
> > rathe rare (1/8 or so times for me) -- it happens when the the opmode
> > driver's init routine completed prior to the driver's async callback opmode
> > start call.
>
> I'd claim it should never happen unless you have several devices on the system using the same
> opmode, or unless you do:
> modprobe iwlwifi #which will load iwl{d,m}vm
> rmmod iwl{d,m}vm #and do _not_ remove iwlwifi
> modprobe iwlwifi
That is indeed one way one can easily reproduce this. There are however other
ways too. Try a loop of
modprobe -r iwlmvm (which removes iwlwifi) followed by modprobe iwlmvm;
while this check for which path is taken, or better yet check if the
list of drvs is empty on opmode registration. Every now and then I see
the list is empty.
I have a feeling this is then also a rare rarely observed by your QA team
as well, so this code then is also stitching together a set of sequence
calls for both paths.
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> Luca is OOO, but this looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by ?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 2:08 [RFC 0/5] iwlwifi: enhance final opmode work Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-17 2:08 ` [RFC 1/5] iwlwifi: fix drv cleanup on opmode registration failure Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-19 9:16 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2017-02-20 17:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-02-17 2:09 ` [RFC 2/5] iwlwifi: fix request_module() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-19 9:47 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2017-02-21 2:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-21 7:16 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2017-02-21 18:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-21 20:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 0:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iwlwifi: corner case fix and request module changes Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iwlwifi: fix drv cleanup on opmode registration failure Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iwlwifi: simplify requesting ops module Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iwlwifi: share opmode start code Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iwlwifi: share opmode start work code Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-22 2:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iwlwifi: convert final opmode work into a workqueue Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-17 2:09 ` [RFC 3/5] iwlwifi: share opmode start work code Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-17 2:09 ` [RFC 4/5] iwlwifi: move opmode loading to shared routine Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-17 2:09 ` [RFC 5/5] iwlwifi: convert final opmode work into a workqueue Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-01 7:12 ` [RFC 0/5] iwlwifi: enhance final opmode work Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220173216.GD31264@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.