diff for duplicates of <20170221123726.2db7db19@xhacker> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1e57db6..607b8d5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:21:35 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Jisheng, > -> On lun., f?vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote: +> On lun., févr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote: > > > In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_swbm(), we access fields of rx_desc > > and tx_desc. These DMA descs are allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, they diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 00f4613..635f887 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,16 @@ "ref\020170220125344.3555-1-jszhang@marvell.com\0" "ref\0877f4laqog.fsf@free-electrons.com\0" - "From\0jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance\0" + "From\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance\0" "Date\0Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:37:40 +0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>\0" + "Cc\0<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>" + <davem@davemloft.net> + <arnd@arndb.de> + <mw@semihalf.com> + <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + <netdev@vger.kernel.org> + " <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Gregory,\n" @@ -12,7 +19,7 @@ "\n" "> Hi Jisheng,\n" "> \n" - "> On lun., f?vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote:\n" + "> On lun., f\303\251vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote:\n" "> \n" "> > In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_swbm(), we access fields of rx_desc\n" "> > and tx_desc. These DMA descs are allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, they\n" @@ -152,4 +159,4 @@ "> > \n" > -fe2f5e6acf54e2823dfda8c07407fcfdc020ebfc565c7b183212061ae738c8fe +279e85b98a67aca34d58011248d45418c128dfa03c2e05cbf6a8be2e658c5dd2
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1e57db6..2cd2441 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:21:35 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Jisheng, > -> On lun., f?vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote: +> On lun., févr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote: > > > In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_swbm(), we access fields of rx_desc > > and tx_desc. These DMA descs are allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, they @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ the bandwidth as 8/1.42, what do you think? > Also without HWBM enabled (so with the same configuration of your test), > I didn't noticed any improvement with the patch set applied. But at ->From bandwidth point of view, yes, there's no improvement. But from cpu +From bandwidth point of view, yes, there's no improvement. But from cpu time/load point of view, I do see a trivial improvement. Could you also did a simple test from your side to see whether we have similar improvement data? @@ -142,4 +142,10 @@ Jisheng > > -- > > 2.11.0 > > -> +> + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 00f4613..0693583 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,16 @@ "ref\020170220125344.3555-1-jszhang@marvell.com\0" "ref\0877f4laqog.fsf@free-electrons.com\0" - "From\0jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance\0" + "From\0Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mvneta: improve rx/tx performance\0" "Date\0Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:37:40 +0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>\0" + "Cc\0thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com" + arnd@arndb.de + netdev@vger.kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + mw@semihalf.com + davem@davemloft.net + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Gregory,\n" @@ -12,7 +19,7 @@ "\n" "> Hi Jisheng,\n" "> \n" - "> On lun., f?vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote:\n" + "> On lun., f\303\251vr. 20 2017, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> wrote:\n" "> \n" "> > In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_swbm(), we access fields of rx_desc\n" "> > and tx_desc. These DMA descs are allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, they\n" @@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ "> Also without HWBM enabled (so with the same configuration of your test),\n" "> I didn't noticed any improvement with the patch set applied. But at\n" "\n" - ">From bandwidth point of view, yes, there's no improvement. But from cpu\n" + "From bandwidth point of view, yes, there's no improvement. But from cpu\n" "time/load point of view, I do see a trivial improvement. Could you also\n" "did a simple test from your side to see whether we have similar improvement\n" "data?\n" @@ -150,6 +157,12 @@ "> > -- \n" "> > 2.11.0\n" "> > \n" - > + "> \n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -fe2f5e6acf54e2823dfda8c07407fcfdc020ebfc565c7b183212061ae738c8fe +c8939b69e3167296479afe6f6ba4565bdda0836682877347ca604246ff387c2c
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.