All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: clear delalloc and cache on buffered write failure
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:56:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221135639.GA26768@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487684787-5004-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:46:27AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> commit fa7f138ac4c70dc00519c124cf7cd4862a0a5b0e upstream.
> 
> The buffered write failure handling code in
> xfs_file_iomap_end_delalloc() has a couple minor problems. First, if
> written == 0, start_fsb is not rounded down and it fails to kill off a
> delalloc block if the start offset is block unaligned. This results in a
> lingering delalloc block and broken delalloc block accounting detected
> at unmount time. Fix this by rounding down start_fsb in the unlikely
> event that written == 0.
> 
> Second, it is possible for a failed overwrite of a delalloc extent to
> leave dirty pagecache around over a hole in the file. This is because is
> possible to hit ->iomap_end() on write failure before the iomap code has
> attempted to allocate pagecache, and thus has no need to clean it up. If
> the targeted delalloc extent was successfully written by a previous
> write, however, then it does still have dirty pages when ->iomap_end()
> punches out the underlying blocks. This ultimately results in writeback
> over a hole. To fix this problem, unconditionally punch out the
> pagecache from XFS before the associated delalloc range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
> ---
> 
> This is for stable... it fixes a latent regression exposed by
> d1908f52557b ("fs: break out of iomap_file_buffered_write on fatal
> signals"), which is to be backported to 4.8+ stable kernels.

For XFS patches, I need an explicit ack from the maintainer before
applying them, as per their instructions in the past...

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-21 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 13:46 [PATCH] xfs: clear delalloc and cache on buffered write failure Brian Foster
2017-02-21 13:56 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-02-21 14:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-21 14:47     ` Greg KH
2017-02-21 16:33   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170221135639.GA26768@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.