[PATCH v5 0/1] Conditional config include

["Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>]

Let's try this again. v4 and before can be found in the original
thread [1]. The remaining issues of v4 were

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:40:59PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Ping..
>
> There was some discussion after v4. I think the open issues are:
>
>   - the commit message is rather terse (it should describe motivation,
>     and can refer to the docs for the "how")

Fixed

>
>   - the syntax might be more clear as:
>
>        [include-if "gitdir:..."]
>
>     or
>
>        [include "gitdir-is:..."]

I'll go with include-if. It feels a bit awkward to add -is to every
new type of condition.

>   - there is an open question of whether we would like to go this route,
>     maintaining backwards compatibility syntactically (and thus having
>     these includes quietly skipped in older versions), or introduce a
>     breaking syntax that could be more convenient, like:
>
>       [if-gitdir(...):section]
>       conditional-but-no-include-necessary = true
>
>     I do not have a strong opinion myself, though I had written the
>     original [include] assuming syntactic compatibility, and I think it
>     has worked out (e.g., you can manipulate include.path via "git
>     config" just as you would any other key).

I'll go with the what we have done, at least it's proven not provoking
too bad effects. So no breaking syntax.

[1] http://public-inbox.org/git/20160714153311.2166-1-pclouds@gmail.com/

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (1):
  config: add conditional include

 Documentation/config.txt  |  54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 config.c                  | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t1305-config-include.sh |  56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 210 insertions(+)

-- 
2.11.0.157.gd943d85