From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751465AbdBXRVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:21:44 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:53422 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322AbdBXRVi (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:21:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:35 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Holmberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/Kconfig.debug: correct documentation paths Message-ID: <20170224102135.1636b84f@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20161213144054.GA5579@Gaia> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:20 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > What happened with this patch? I am asking because on top of > next-20170224 I found some more sysrq.txt obsolete paths... including > the ones fixed here. I am not sure whether I am fixing something > already fixed? What happened, most likely, is that I saw /lib/Kconfig.debug and assumed it was one of the many patches sent my way that aren't really up to me to handle. But nobody else really owns /lib either, I guess. I've dug the patch out of my archive and will get it in. Thanks, jon