From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [bug report] dp83640: Delay scheduled work.
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:36:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170228063612.GA25830@mwanda> (raw)
Hello Stefan Sørensen,
The patch 4b063258ab93: "dp83640: Delay scheduled work." from Nov 3,
2015, leads to the following static checker warning:
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c:1442 dp83640_rxtstamp()
warn: 'skb' was already freed.
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
1402 struct dp83640_skb_info *skb_info = (struct dp83640_skb_info *)skb->cb;
1403 struct list_head *this, *next;
1404 struct rxts *rxts;
1405 struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps = NULL;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1406 unsigned long flags;
1407
1408 if (is_status_frame(skb, type)) {
1409 decode_status_frame(dp83640, skb);
1410 kfree_skb(skb);
1411 return true;
1412 }
1413
1414 if (!dp83640->hwts_rx_en)
1415 return false;
1416
1417 if ((type & dp83640->version) == 0 || (type & dp83640->layer) == 0)
1418 return false;
1419
1420 spin_lock_irqsave(&dp83640->rx_lock, flags);
1421 prune_rx_ts(dp83640);
1422 list_for_each_safe(this, next, &dp83640->rxts) {
1423 rxts = list_entry(this, struct rxts, list);
1424 if (match(skb, type, rxts)) {
1425 shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
1426 memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
1427 shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(rxts->ns);
1428 netif_rx_ni(skb);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If shhwtstamps is non-NULL then we call netif_rx_ni(skb);. If this
call returns NET_RX_DROP then that means we've done a kfree_skb(skb).
1429 list_del_init(&rxts->list);
1430 list_add(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxpool);
1431 break;
1432 }
1433 }
1434 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp83640->rx_lock, flags);
1435
1436 if (!shhwtstamps) {
1437 skb_info->ptp_type = type;
1438 skb_info->tmo = jiffies + SKB_TIMESTAMP_TIMEOUT;
1439 skb_queue_tail(&dp83640->rx_queue, skb);
1440 schedule_delayed_work(&dp83640->ts_work, SKB_TIMESTAMP_TIMEOUT);
1441 } else {
1442 netif_rx_ni(skb);
And then we call it a second time outside the spinlock. When I look at
the commit which added this, it feels like something that was added by
mistake. But I'm really familiar enough with this code to say if I
haven't missed something.
1443 }
1444
1445 return true;
1446 }
regards,
dan carpenter
reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170228063612.GA25830@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.