From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] pci: Accomodate 64 bit BARs in
 pci_dev::resource[]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:41:50 +0800
Message-ID: <20170228104150.GD13926@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
References: <cover.1488204259.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
 <dafbe2f41f0db41ec09bcc4c35ae873892ced877.1488204259.git.agordeev@redhat.com>
 <20170228070225.GK10022@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
 <20170228095151.GA6585@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
 <20170228095501.GB13926@pxdev.xzpeter.org>
 <20170228102213.GD6583@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39144 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751500AbdB1Kn1 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:43:27 -0500
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF76EC05AA5B
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170228102213.GD6583@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:22:14AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:55:01PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:

[...]

> INVALID_PHYS_ADDR is also confusing if we think of index into
> high-part of 64-bit address. A high-part is apparently valid.

Btw, if this stands, then maybe we can consider drop patch 2, since
that patch did exactly the thing mentioned here... Thanks,

-- peterx