From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Orphan usb/net/hso driver Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:51:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20170228175124.GA14016@kroah.com> References: <30ad43134a6a7d155a257abaa31d120cf2c4d74c.1488271188.git.baruch@tkos.co.il> <20170228.103844.1220680109576438605.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: baruch@tkos.co.il, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:33374 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbdB1Rwe (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:52:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170228.103844.1220680109576438605.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:38:44AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Baruch Siach > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:39:48 +0200 > > > The email address of Jan Dumon bounces, and there is not relevant information > > in the linked website. > > > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach > > This patch is fine and I will apply it later, however I will make a > general statement that we list USB networking drivers very > inconsistently. > > Specifically, some list linux-usb as the mailing list, others list > netdev. We should figure out which one (or both) is the best to > specify, and apply that rule consitently to the MAINTAINERS file. I don't want them :) Seriously, I don't have a problem with the patches being cc:ed to linux-usb as long as you will take them, as often times the issues involved are USB specific things, not network driver-specific things, so the developers here can weigh in on them. Want me to make up a patch to do that? thanks, greg k-h