All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG during generic/270 with v4.10
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:13:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302171329.GN3213@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170302164701.GJ26319@birch.djwong.org>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:47:01AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:13:00PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > By running generic/270 in a loop on an XFS filesystem mounted with DAX I'm
> > > able to reliably generate the following kernel bug after a few (~10)
> > > iterations (output passed through kasan_symbolize.py):
> > > 
> > > run fstests generic/270 at 2017-02-22 12:01:05
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): Unmounting Filesystem
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): Mounting V5 Filesystem
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): Ending clean mount
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): Quotacheck needed: Please wait.
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): Quotacheck: Done.
> > > XFS (pmem0p2): xlog_verify_grant_tail: space > BBTOB(tail_blocks)
> > > XFS: Assertion failed: XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_super.c, line: 965
> > 
> > This means we've reclaimed an inode that still has delayed allocation
> > blocks, which shouldn't occur. We do have one recent fix in this area:
> > fa7f138 ("xfs: clear delalloc and cache on buffered write failure"). Do
> > you still reproduce this? If so, does it reproduce with that patch?
> > 
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > ...
> > > ---[ end trace 384d06985052f068 ]---
> > > 
> > > Here's the xfstests run:
> > > 
> > > FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
> > > PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 alara 4.10.0
> > > MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/pmem0p2
> > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/pmem0p2 /mnt/xfstests_scratch
> > > 
> > > generic/270 24s ..../check: line 596: 15817 Segmentation fault      ./$seq > $tmp.rawout 2>&1
> > >  [failed, exit status 139] - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//generic/270.out.bad)
> > >     --- tests/generic/270.out	2016-10-21 15:31:10.568945780 -0600
> > >     +++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/270.out.bad	2017-02-22 12:01:29.272718284 -0700
> > >     @@ -3,6 +3,3 @@
> > >      Run fsstress
> > >      
> > >      Run dd writers in parallel
> > >     -Comparing user usage
> > >     -Comparing group usage
> > >     -Comparing filesystem consistency
> > >     ...
> > >     (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/270.out /root/xfstests/results//generic/270.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
> > > 
> > > This was done in my normal test setup, which is a pair of PMEM disks that
> > > enable DAX.
> > > 
> > 
> > What I'm a little confused about though is that I thought DAX meant we
> > bypassed buffered I/O and always used direct I/O (which means you should
> > never perform delayed allocation). :/
> 
> The block devices are pmem, but I don't think g/270 does anything
> special to turn on DAX (the inode flag) for the files it's writing.
> 

Doesn't the dax mount force the inode flag?

Brian

> --D
> 
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > Here are the versions of xfstests and xfsprogs that I'm using:
> > > 
> > > xfstets: f438604 generic: test mmap io through DAX and non-DAX
> > > 
> > > xfsprogs: xfs_admin version 4.9.0
> > > This is just the xfsprogs that comes packaged with Fedora 25.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > - Ross
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-02 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-22 19:13 XFS kernel BUG during generic/270 with v4.10 Ross Zwisler
2017-02-22 19:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-03-02 16:29 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-02 16:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-02 17:13     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-03-02 17:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-02 17:25     ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-06 18:41   ` Ross Zwisler
2017-03-06 18:48     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-07 14:32     ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170302171329.GN3213@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.