All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Bhupinder Thakur <bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Add two new vpl011 parameters to xenstore
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 15:58:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303205801.GC18423@char.us.ORACLE.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487676368-22356-8-git-send-email-bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:56:04PM +0530, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> Add two new parameters to the xen store:
>     - newly allocated PFN to be used as IN/OUT ring buffer by xenconsoled
>     - a new event channel read from Xen using a hvm call to be used by xenconsoled
>       for eventing

This should have a correspoinding change in the include/public/io/console.h
describing this new 'vpl011-port' and 'vpl011-ring-ref' Xenbus entry.

Feel free to lift from kbdif.h.

Unless an earlier patch already does this? In which case you should
mention it:

"Patch titled XYZ introduces these XenBus entries in console.h"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhupinder Thakur <bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/libxl/libxl.c          |  6 ++++++
>  tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c      | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> index d400fa2..cc00235 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> @@ -3159,6 +3159,12 @@ int libxl__device_console_add(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>          flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu32, state->console_port));
>          flexarray_append(ro_front, "ring-ref");
>          flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%lu", state->console_mfn));
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +        flexarray_append(ro_front, "vpl011-port");
> +        flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu32, state->vpl011_console_port));
> +        flexarray_append(ro_front, "vpl011-ring-ref");
> +        flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%lu", state->vpl011_console_mfn));
> +#endif

so... what if the VPL011 is not enabled in the guest? Should we still
create these XenBus entries?

>      } else {
>          flexarray_append(front, "state");
>          flexarray_append(front, GCSPRINTF("%d", XenbusStateInitialising));
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> index d519c8d..39eaff6 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>      libxl_ctx *ctx = libxl__gc_owner(gc);
>      char *xs_domid, *con_domid;
>      int rc;
> -    uint64_t size;
> +    uint64_t size, val=-1;

So -1 for uint64_t is 0xffffffff... 

Is that what you meant? And why? Why not not uint32_t?


>  
>      if (xc_domain_max_vcpus(ctx->xch, domid, info->max_vcpus) != 0) {
>          LOG(ERROR, "Couldn't set max vcpu count");
> @@ -432,6 +432,16 @@ int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>      state->store_port = xc_evtchn_alloc_unbound(ctx->xch, domid, state->store_domid);
>      state->console_port = xc_evtchn_alloc_unbound(ctx->xch, domid, state->console_domid);
>  
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +    /* get the vpl011 event channel from Xen */

Please remove this comment.

> +    rc = xc_hvm_param_get(ctx->xch, domid, HVM_PARAM_VPL011_CONSOLE_EVTCHN,
> +            &val);
> +    if ( rc )
> +        state->vpl011_console_port = -1;
> +    else
> +        state->vpl011_console_port = (uint32_t)val;
> +#endif
> +
>      if (info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM) {
>          hvm_set_conf_params(ctx->xch, domid, info);
>  #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> @@ -727,6 +737,9 @@ int libxl__build_pv(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>  
>      dom->flags = flags;
>      dom->console_evtchn = state->console_port;
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +    dom->vpl011_console_evtchn = state->vpl011_console_port;
> +#endif
>      dom->console_domid = state->console_domid;
>      dom->xenstore_evtchn = state->store_port;
>      dom->xenstore_domid = state->store_domid;
> @@ -771,6 +784,9 @@ int libxl__build_pv(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
>      if (xc_dom_feature_translated(dom)) {
>          state->console_mfn = dom->console_pfn;
>          state->store_mfn = dom->xenstore_pfn;
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +        state->vpl011_console_mfn = dom->vpl011_console_pfn;
> +#endif
>      } else {
>          state->console_mfn = xc_dom_p2m(dom, dom->console_pfn);
>          state->store_mfn = xc_dom_p2m(dom, dom->xenstore_pfn);
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
> index 5f46578..10e262e 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
> @@ -1128,6 +1128,10 @@ typedef struct {
>      uint32_t num_vmemranges;
>  
>      xc_domain_configuration_t config;
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> +    unsigned long vpl011_console_mfn;
> +#endif

I am not a big fan of these #ifdef.

Could they go away and this could would be compiled on x86 too but
just never used? (The default value to use this owuld be disabled
for example)?

>  } libxl__domain_build_state;
>  
>  _hidden int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-03 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 11:25 [PATCH 00/11] pl011 emulation support in Xen Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Add pl011 uart emulation " Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-26 21:37   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-03 19:19     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-21 13:27     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-21 19:38       ` Julien Grall
2017-03-23  9:44         ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-23 13:51           ` Julien Grall
2017-03-03 19:59   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05  1:04     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06 14:22       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05  1:15     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-05 11:59     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-22  5:50     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-05 12:12   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-23  9:14     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-23 14:16       ` Julien Grall
2017-03-24 10:39         ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Add new hvm params in Xen for ring buffer/event setup Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 20:02   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-24  6:58     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-05 12:35   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06  8:06     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-06 11:42       ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06 12:41         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-06 13:21           ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06 13:48             ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-08 14:45               ` Julien Grall
2017-03-08 15:21                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-08 18:22                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-11 14:38                     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-04-11 22:07                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-04-14  7:12                         ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-04-19 18:43                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-06 14:48             ` George Dunlap
2017-03-08 13:52               ` Julien Grall
2017-03-24  7:31     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Refactor evtchn_send in Xen to allow sending events from a xen bound channel Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 21:13   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-06 10:16     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-06 10:35       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-05 12:39   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06  8:15     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-06 10:44       ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-06 10:54         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-06 11:12           ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-28  9:43             ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Enable vpl011 emulation for a domain in Xen Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 21:47   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05 12:46   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-06  8:27     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Initialize nr_spis in vgic_init in Xen to atleast 1 Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 20:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05 12:51   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-16  6:50     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-16  8:24       ` Julien Grall
2017-03-16 10:31         ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-16 13:24           ` Julien Grall
2017-03-20 16:29             ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Add a new pl011 uart node in the guest DT in the toolstack Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 20:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-03 21:03   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05 12:59     ` Julien Grall
2017-03-05 13:04   ` Julien Grall
2017-03-14 13:00     ` Wei Liu
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Add two new vpl011 parameters to xenstore Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 20:58   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-03-28  7:49     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Allocate a new PFN in the toolstack and pass to Xen using a hvm call Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 20:51   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-05 13:07     ` Julien Grall
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Modify domain_create_ring in xenconsole to map the ring buffer and event channel Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 21:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Modify handle_ring_read and buffer_append to read/append vpl011 data Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 21:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-02-21 11:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] xen/arm: vpl011: Modify handle_tty_read in xenconsole to redirect user data to vpl011 IN ring buffer Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-03 21:17   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-03 20:23 ` [PATCH 00/11] pl011 emulation support in Xen Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-03 21:15   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-14  7:44   ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-03-05 11:46 ` Julien Grall
2017-03-14  7:47   ` Bhupinder Thakur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170303205801.GC18423@char.us.ORACLE.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.