From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid panic during boot due to divide by zero in init_cache_info()
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:17:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306141735.GR31469@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306120319.GA17443@visitor2.iram.es>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 01:03:19PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > > The PowerPC divw etc. instructions do not trap by themselves, but recent
> > > > GCC inserts trap instructions on code paths that are always undefined
> > > > behaviour (like, dividing by zero).
> > >
> > > Is it systematic or does it depend from, e.g., optimization levels?
> >
> > In this case it needs -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference which is
> > default at -O2 and higher.
>
> Great, another optimization-dependent behaviour. :-(
It makes the "behaviour" for undefined behaviour *less* surprising.
It does not change anything else: malformed programs stay malformed,
correct programs do exactly what they did before, too.
> But this is not the most serious issue: on PPC, when you #include
> <limits>, the numeric_limits<any_integer_type>::traps is false on PPC,
> and on no other architecture that I know of (in practice this trap
> reflects the hardware behaviour on division by zero).
>
> By generating a trap in this case, I believe that the compiler violates
> a contract given by <limits>, and the standard.
[ snip ]
I have no idea why you are bringing C++ into this. Please open a PR
if you think there is a bug in the C++ library.
I'll note that this cannot violate the standard, see the "terms and
definitions":
[defns.undefined]
undefined behavior
behavior for which this International Standard imposes no requirements
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-06 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-04 23:54 [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid panic during boot due to divide by zero in init_cache_info() Anton Blanchard
2017-03-05 0:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-03-05 0:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-03-05 10:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-05 12:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-03-05 16:58 ` Gabriel Paubert
2017-03-05 17:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-03-05 23:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-03-06 0:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2017-03-06 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-03-06 12:03 ` Gabriel Paubert
2017-03-06 14:17 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2017-03-06 15:18 ` David Laight
2017-03-05 10:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-08 7:25 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170306141735.GR31469@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paubert@iram.es \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.