From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/nmi: Fix and optimize the NMI stack check code
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:42:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309224447.852428776@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20170309224204.066497548@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-x86-nmi-Fix-and-optimize-the-NMI-stack-check-code.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2282 bytes --]
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Andy Lutomirski reported an off by one in the NMI stack check
for the nested NMI code, where if the stack pointer was one above
the actual stack (stack start + STACK_SIZE) it would trigger a false
positive. This is not that big of a deal because the stack pointer
should never be that. Even if a stack was using the pages just
above the NMI stack, it would require the stack about to overflow
for this to trigger, which is a much bigger bug than this is fixing.
Also, Linus Torvalds pointed out that doing two compares can be
accomplish with a single compare. That is:
("reg" is top of stack we are comparing "stack" to)
cmpq reg, stack
jae label // note, code had one off "ja" instead of "jae"
subq size, reg
cmpq reg, stack
jb label
Is the same as:
subq $1, reg
subq stack, reg
cmpq size, reg
jae label
The subq $1 was added into the leaq by doing:
leaq 5*8+7(%rsp), %rdx
Added more comments as well.
Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Inspired-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 3aad759aace2..1e6ca3740762 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1355,16 +1355,17 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
* if it controls the kernel's RSP. We set DF before we clear
* "NMI executing".
*/
- lea 6*8(%rsp), %rdx
- /* Compare the NMI stack (rdx) with the stack we came from (4*8(%rsp)) */
- cmpq %rdx, 4*8(%rsp)
- /* If the stack pointer is above the NMI stack, this is a normal NMI */
- ja first_nmi
-
- subq $EXCEPTION_STKSZ, %rdx
- cmpq %rdx, 4*8(%rsp)
- /* If it is below the NMI stack, it is a normal NMI */
- jb first_nmi
+
+ /* Load address of the top of this stack into rdx */
+ lea 5*8+7(%rsp), %rdx
+ /* Subtract the return stack pointer from it */
+ subq 4*8(%rsp), %rdx
+ /*
+ * If the result is greater or equal to the stack size,
+ * then the return stack was not on this stack.
+ */
+ cmpq $EXCEPTION_STKSZ, %rdx
+ jae first_nmi
/* Ah, it is within the NMI stack. */
--
2.10.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 22:42 [PATCH 0/2] x86/nmi: Optimize address compares with better jump algorithm Steven Rostedt
2017-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/nmi: Optimize the check for being in the repeat_nmi code Steven Rostedt
2017-03-10 2:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 3:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-10 3:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-10 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-10 19:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-09 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-03-10 2:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/nmi: Fix and optimize the NMI stack check code Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170309224447.852428776@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.