From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: add check of binaries architecture
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:54:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170312175443.GD3739@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170312182913.0c6dc2cd@free-electrons.com>
Thomas, All,
On 2017-03-12 18:29 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:15:43 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>
> > That is not possible in all situations.
> >
> > For example, I have a board here with a kind of co-processor of a
> > different architecture; the firmware for that co-processor is loaded
> > at runtime. It is an ELF file, and it is in target/.
> >
> > So I don't think it is possible to check that all ELF files are for the
> > Buildroot-known target.
> >
> > We already discussed this a while ago and came to the same conclusiong
> > back then.
>
> I don't think I want to give up that easily on this, especially
> considering how many times we get submission for packages that are not
> actually cross-compiled.
I agree.
> Could you be more specific about these firmware files? Where are they
> located?
In theory, those kind of files may be located anywhere, but in this
specific case, it is in /lib/firmware.
The firmware files could be moved elsewhere, of course, but:
1) /lib/firmware is the "standard" location for firmware files;
2) a binary-only tool can be used to load the firmware and could
expect it to be located there.
> Perhaps with a test restricted to {usr,}/{bin,sbin,lib}, we can avoid
> testing those firmware files.
I think this would be sensible, as long as /lib/firmware is excluded, as
well as /usr/lib/firmware (in case of merged /usr).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-12 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-12 15:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] arch: add BR2_READELF_ARCH_NAME hidden config option Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-12 15:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: add check of binaries architecture Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-12 15:15 ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-03-12 17:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-12 17:54 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2017-03-12 17:31 ` Baruch Siach
2017-03-12 19:03 ` Peter Seiderer
2017-03-12 19:22 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-03-12 19:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170312175443.GD3739@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.