From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78572F7D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:15:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=intel; t=1489587353; x=1521123353; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=U2rGSGYHNSNFESrOwmBfgvu6eepX5boXulxisgYp4Uo=; b=BcAEOKojiUaOQsDl1QWMDzkIHjozr1k7YT9PdA6eS8/eexZgViXq1IYS Z/vvB7UyMJZwr/CrYqSMSfT5pvkZ5w==; Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2017 07:15:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,168,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="60699905" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2017 07:15:51 -0700 Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDFE2C8001; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:01:43 +0200 From: Ed Bartosh To: Patrick Ohly Message-ID: <20170315140143.GA17397@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com References: <7d4a770f-25c6-5747-5a5c-370c822f2efb@mlbassoc.com> <20170308134349.GA16099@linux.intel.com> <20170314171147.GA28498@linux.intel.com> <1489513785.6396.83.camel@intel.com> <20170314180644.GA22000@linux.intel.com> <1489562674.6396.89.camel@intel.com> <20170315125810.GA28986@linux.intel.com> <1489585158.6396.102.camel@intel.com> <1489585294.6396.104.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1489585294.6396.104.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Gary Thomas , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Create more than one image with WIC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:15:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote: > > > Regarding do_rm_work. It should not touch rootfs directories, I believe. > > > It does, and it should by default because a rootfs can be quite large. > If it's not going to be reused in another recipe, then it is worthwhile > to remove it. This is true unless we're going to use wic as a stand-alone tool, which some people still do. > I should add that RM_WORK_EXCLUDE_ITEMS += "rootfs" can be used in image > recipes which know that their rootfs is going to be needed elsewhere - > it's just not the default. Isn't rootfs going to be rebuilt if one rootfs recipe depends on another one? -- Regards, Ed