From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [net-next PATCH 4/5] net: Commonize busy polling code to focus on napi_id instead of socket
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:32:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316183256.15806.38680.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316183142.15806.38824.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Move the core functionality in sk_busy_loop() to napi_busy_loop() and
make it independent of sk.
This enables re-using this function in epoll busy loop implementation.
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
include/net/busy_poll.h | 9 +++++++++
net/core/dev.c | 16 ++++++++--------
net/core/sock.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index 67991635953e..24bc10d56b49 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static inline bool busy_loop_timeout(unsigned long end_time)
bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock);
+bool napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id, unsigned long end_time, int nonblock,
+ bool (*loop_end)(void *), void *loop_end_arg);
+
/* used in the NIC receive handler to mark the skb */
static inline void skb_mark_napi_id(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct napi_struct *napi)
@@ -110,6 +113,12 @@ static inline bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
return false;
}
+static inline bool napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id, unsigned long end_time,
+ int nonblock, bool (*loop_end)(void *),
+ void *loop_end_arg)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
/* used in the protocol hanlder to propagate the napi_id to the socket */
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7869ae3837ca..4e55765c6998 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5060,9 +5060,9 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock)
do_softirq();
}
-bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
+bool napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id, unsigned long end_time, int nonblock,
+ bool (*loop_end)(void *), void *loop_end_arg)
{
- unsigned long end_time = !nonblock ? sk_busy_loop_end_time(sk) : 0;
int (*napi_poll)(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget);
void *have_poll_lock = NULL;
struct napi_struct *napi;
@@ -5074,7 +5074,7 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
rcu_read_lock();
- napi = napi_by_id(sk->sk_napi_id);
+ napi = napi_by_id(napi_id);
if (!napi)
goto out;
@@ -5102,11 +5102,11 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
trace_napi_poll(napi, rc, BUSY_POLL_BUDGET);
count:
if (rc > 0)
- __NET_ADD_STATS(sock_net(sk),
+ __NET_ADD_STATS(dev_net(napi->dev),
LINUX_MIB_BUSYPOLLRXPACKETS, rc);
local_bh_enable();
- if (nonblock || !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+ if (nonblock || loop_end(loop_end_arg) ||
busy_loop_timeout(end_time))
break;
@@ -5116,7 +5116,7 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
preempt_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
- rc = !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+ rc = loop_end(loop_end_arg);
if (rc || busy_loop_timeout(end_time))
return rc;
goto restart;
@@ -5126,12 +5126,12 @@ bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
if (napi_poll)
busy_poll_stop(napi, have_poll_lock);
preempt_enable();
- rc = !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+ rc = loop_end(loop_end_arg);
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
return rc;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_busy_loop);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(napi_busy_loop);
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 74288b2d4b3d..f606d89f044a 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -3205,3 +3205,21 @@ static int __init proto_init(void)
subsys_initcall(proto_init);
#endif /* PROC_FS */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
+static bool sk_napi_busy_loop_end(void *p)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = p;
+
+ return !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
+bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
+{
+ unsigned long end_time = !nonblock ? sk_busy_loop_end_time(sk) : 0;
+
+ return napi_busy_loop(sk->sk_napi_id, end_time, nonblock,
+ sk_napi_busy_loop_end, sk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_busy_loop);
+#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 18:32 [net-next PATCH 0/5] Add busy poll support for epoll under certain circumstances Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 18:32 ` [net-next PATCH 1/5] net: Do not record sender_cpu as napi_id in socket receive paths Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-16 22:33 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-17 2:40 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-17 2:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-17 2:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-17 2:59 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:41 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2017-03-16 18:32 ` [net-next PATCH 2/5] net: Call sk_mark_napi_id() in the ACK receive path Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-16 22:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 18:32 ` [net-next PATCH 3/5] net: Introduce SO_INCOMING_NAPI_ID Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-16 18:32 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2017-03-16 18:33 ` [net-next PATCH 5/5] epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket fds Alexander Duyck
2017-03-16 22:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-03-16 22:38 ` Alexander Duyck
[not found] ` <20170316183142.15806.38824.stgit-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-18 11:45 ` [net-next PATCH 0/5] Add busy poll support for epoll under certain circumstances Michael Kerrisk
2017-03-18 11:45 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170316183256.15806.38680.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.