From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752484AbdCPTXA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:23:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:41498 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751957AbdCPTW7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:22:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:22:31 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Hunter , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Wang Nan , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 'perf test tsc' failing, bisected to "sched/clock: Provide better clock continuity" Message-ID: <20170316192231.GB12825@kernel.org> References: <20170316140103.GU12825@kernel.org> <20170316145311.4daeysai4r3vunlv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170316181121.h4oiaewfyexwbdxz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170316183617.GY12825@kernel.org> <20170316192138.GA12825@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170316192138.GA12825@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:21:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:36:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:11:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:01:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > [root@jouet ~]# perf test -v tsc > > > > > 55: Convert perf time to TSC : > > > > > Convert perf time to TSC: FAILED! > > > > > sched/clock: Provide better clock continuity > > > > > > Right, ahunter also complained about this. I had a half arsed fugly > > > > patch in the works. Let me see if I can improve and finish. > > > > > The below seems to cure things for me... > > > > Building... > > Didn't apply to perf/urgent: > > [acme@jouet linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch > patching file arch/x86/events/core.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2243 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 2251 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 2265 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #4 succeeded at 2273 (offset -1 lines). > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/timer.h > patching file arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 328. perf/core almost super clean: [acme@felicio linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch patching file arch/x86/events/core.c patching file arch/x86/include/asm/timer.h patching file arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c patching file include/linux/sched/clock.h patching file kernel/sched/clock.c Hunk #3 succeeded at 154 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 231 (offset -7 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 317 (offset -7 lines). [acme@felicio linux]$ Building...