All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 untested] kvm: better MWAIT emulation for guests
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:27:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316192622-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316164749.GG4085@HEDWIG.INI.CMU.EDU>

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:01:58PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > 2017-03-16 16:35+0100, Radim Krčmář:
> > > 2017-03-16 10:58-0400, Gabriel L. Somlo:
> > >> The intel manual said the same thing back in 2010 as well. However,
> > >> regardless of how any flags were set, interrupt-window exiting or not,
> > >> "normal" L1 MWAIT behavior was that it woke up immediately regardless.
> > >> Remember, never going to sleep is still correct ("normal" ?) behavior
> > >> per the ISA definition of MWAIT :)
> > > 
> > > I'll write a simple kvm-unit-test to better understand why it is broken
> > > for you ...
> > 
> > Please get git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git
> > 
> > and try this, thanks!
> > 
> > ---8<---
> > x86/mwait: crappy test
> > 
> > `./configure && make` to build it, then follow the comment in code to
> > try few cases.
> 
> kvm-unit-tests]$ time TIMEOUT=20 ./x86-run x86/mwait.flat -append '0 1 1'
> timeout -k 1s --foreground 20 qemu-kvm -nodefaults -enable-kvm -device pc-testdev -device isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -vnc none -serial stdio -device pci-testdev -kernel x86/mwait.flat -append 0 1 1
> enabling apic
> PASS: resumed from mwait 10000 times
> SUMMARY: 1 tests
> 
> real    0m10.564s
> user    0m10.339s
> sys     0m0.225s
> 
> 
> and
> 
> kvm-unit-tests]$ time TIMEOUT=20 ./x86-run x86/mwait.flat -append '0 1 0'
> timeout -k 1s --foreground 20 qemu-kvm -nodefaults -enable-kvm -device pc-testdev -device isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -vnc none -serial stdio -device pci-testdev -kernel x86/mwait.flat -append 0 1 0
> enabling apic
> PASS: resumed from mwait 10000 times
> SUMMARY: 1 tests
> 
> real    0m0.746s
> user    0m0.555s
> sys     0m0.200s
> 
> Both of these with Michael's v5 patch applied, on the MacPro1,1.

Would it make sense to try to set ECX to 0? 0 0 1 and 0 0 0.


> Similar behavior (0 1 1 takes 10 seconds, 0 1 0 returns immediately)
> on the macbook air.
> 
> If I revert to the original (nop-emulated MWAIT) kvm source, I get
> both versions to return immediately.
> 
> HTH,
> --Gabriel
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > ---
> >  x86/Makefile.common |  1 +
> >  x86/mwait.c         | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 x86/mwait.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/x86/Makefile.common b/x86/Makefile.common
> > index 1dad18ba26e1..1e708a6acd39 100644
> > --- a/x86/Makefile.common
> > +++ b/x86/Makefile.common
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ tests-common = $(TEST_DIR)/vmexit.flat $(TEST_DIR)/tsc.flat \
> >                 $(TEST_DIR)/tsc_adjust.flat $(TEST_DIR)/asyncpf.flat \
> >                 $(TEST_DIR)/init.flat $(TEST_DIR)/smap.flat \
> >                 $(TEST_DIR)/hyperv_synic.flat $(TEST_DIR)/hyperv_stimer.flat \
> > +               $(TEST_DIR)/mwait.flat \
> >  
> >  ifdef API
> >  tests-common += api/api-sample
> > diff --git a/x86/mwait.c b/x86/mwait.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c21dab5cc97d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/x86/mwait.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > +#include "vm.h"
> > +
> > +#define TARGET_RESUMES 10000
> > +volatile unsigned page[4096 / 4];
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Execute
> > + *   time TIMEOUT=20 ./x86-run x86/mwait.flat -append '0 1 1'
> > + * (first two arguments are eax and ecx for MWAIT, the third is FLAGS.IF bit)
> > + * I assume you have 1000 Hz scheduler, so the test should take about 10
> > + * seconds to run if mwait works (host timer interrupts will kick mwait).
> > + *
> > + * If you get far less, then mwait is just nop, as in the case of
> > + *
> > + *   time TIMEOUT=20 ./x86-run x86/mwait.flat -append '0 1 0'
> > + *
> > + * All other combinations of arguments should take 10 seconds.
> > + * Getting killed by the TIMEOUT most likely means that you have different HZ,
> > + * but could also be a bug ...
> > + */
> > +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t eax = atol(argv[1]);
> > +	uint32_t ecx = atol(argv[2]);
> > +	bool sti = atol(argv[3]);
> > +	unsigned resumes = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (sti)
> > +		asm volatile ("sti");
> > +	else
> > +		asm volatile ("cli");
> > +
> > +	while (resumes < TARGET_RESUMES) {
> > +		asm volatile("monitor" :: "a" (page), "c" (0), "d" (0));
> > +		asm volatile("mwait" :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
> > +		resumes++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	report("resumed from mwait %u times", resumes == TARGET_RESUMES, resumes);
> > +	return report_summary();
> > +}
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15 21:22 [PATCH v5 untested] kvm: better MWAIT emulation for guests Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-15 23:35 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-15 23:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 13:24     ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 14:04       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 14:58         ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 15:23           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 15:35           ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 16:01             ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 16:47               ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 17:22                 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 17:39                   ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 17:27                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-03-16 17:41                   ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 18:29                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 19:24                       ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 19:27                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 20:17                           ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 21:14                             ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-17  2:03                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-17 13:23                                 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-21  3:22                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-21 16:58                                     ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-21 17:29                                       ` Nadav Amit
2017-03-21 17:29                                         ` Nadav Amit
2017-03-21 19:22                                         ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-21 22:51                                           ` Gabriel Somlo
2017-03-22  0:02                                             ` Nadav Amit
2017-03-22 13:35                                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-22 14:10                                                 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-22 14:15                                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 16:16             ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 16:45               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 16:52                 ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 16:54                   ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 17:14                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-16 17:38                       ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 14:08       ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 15:44         ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-16 15:54           ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-16 16:26             ` Gabriel L. Somlo
2017-03-21 16:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-03-21 18:45   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-27 13:34 ` Alexander Graf
2017-03-28 14:28   ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-28 20:35     ` Jim Mattson
2017-03-29 12:11       ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-03 10:04         ` Alexander Graf
2017-04-04 12:39           ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-04 12:51             ` Alexander Graf
2017-04-04 13:13               ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-04 13:15                 ` Alexander Graf
2017-04-04 13:44                   ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-04 13:44                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Radim Krčmář

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170316192622-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gsomlo@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.