All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD_IMAGE isn't a full path
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:13:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170320101315.GB17263@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315153755.GR19897@bill-the-cat>

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch.  I just want to
> > > point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
> > > still not have a functional rpm build target.  This is at least probably
> > > important for arm.  Of course all of those could also be addressed with
> > > a patch similar to 9442211, and my main concern is making sure
> > > everything gets fixed one way or another.  Thanks!
> > 
> > The patch is 1/6 of a series that also covers other architectures, but
> > patchwork won't should you the rest of the thread. Have a look here for
> > instance: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/22/750.
> 
> Ah, OK, thanks.  I'll just hope it gets in soon, I like being able to
> easily drop new kernels in on my arm64 box :)

I'll pick up the arm64 patch this week (I was on holiday last week).

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-20 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-11 23:59 [PATCH] kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD_IMAGE isn't a full path Tom Rini
2017-03-15 14:51 ` Tom Rini
2017-03-15 15:03   ` Michal Marek
2017-03-15 15:37     ` Tom Rini
2017-03-20 10:13       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-03-20 17:00         ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170320101315.GB17263@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.