From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:35:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37256 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993875AbdCTRfAyNmBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:35:00 +0100 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12060-104.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.122.104]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 210FFB80; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:34:32 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Ben Hutchings , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 08/35] MIPS: Update lemote2f_defconfig for CPU_FREQ_STAT change Message-ID: <20170320173432.GA20708@kroah.com> References: <20170316142906.685052998@linuxfoundation.org> <20170316142907.261390617@linuxfoundation.org> <1489939579.2852.72.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20170320101530.GD14919@linux-mips.org> <20170320162957.GB23463@kroah.com> <20170320165049.GH14919@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170320165049.GH14919@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 57401 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > I don't think so, I don't get warnings for "make ARCH=mips lemote2f_defconfig" > > > > Ok, is it worth reverting as this is an issue on later kernels? > > Same answer as for the other patch - I can't imagine it's going to cause > any problems. Thanks for the response, will leave these as-is. greg k-h