From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Fontana Subject: Re: Licensing of libaudit and libauparse Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20170320201413.GA19744@clifford> References: <20170319033214.GA23622@clifford> <5461078.5fIGDCxYjZ@x2> <20170320031304.GA4113@clifford> <1998000.GV3LKLYfuP@x2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1998000.GV3LKLYfuP@x2> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:48:07AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > > > > is intended to LGPL. Would replacing the comment at the beginning of the > > > file be sufficient to fix this issue? > > > > It may depend on the history of the file. If you were the only person > > who contributed to it, yes. But if anyone else contributed to it, and > > let's say the contributions were not copyrighted by Red Hat, and the > > contributions were sufficiently nontrivial, then maybe we'd have to > > get permission from such other contributors to change the indicated > > license of the file. > > OK. Good to know. I am the sole contributor to that file. I also checked and > fixed some new files in auparse/ to which I am also the sole contributor at the > same time. Everything is good in git and the next release should take care of > this issue. Okay, thank you! Richard