From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nft] src: allow update of net base w. meta l4proto icmpv6
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:54:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170321185437.22959-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
nft add rule ip6 f i meta l4proto ipv6-icmp icmpv6 type nd-router-advert
<cmdline>:1:50-60: Error: conflicting protocols specified: unknown vs. icmpv6
add icmpv6 to nexthdr list so base gets updated correctly.
Reported-by: Thomas Woerner <twoerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
NB: This is STILL not correct.
nft add rule ip6 f i meta l4proto ipv6-icmp icmpv6 type nd-router-advert
gets listed as
icmpv6 type nd-router-advert
because post processing removes the l3 dependency.
However, "icmpv6 type nd-router-advert" uses dependency
ip6 nexthdr icmpv6
which isn't the same as meta l4proto icmpv6.
I suspect nft should always generate implicit l4 dependencies
via meta in the ipv6 case, what do others think
(and not autoremove 'nexthdr' check)?
diff --git a/src/proto.c b/src/proto.c
index 79e9dbf2b33e..fcdfbe73c735 100644
--- a/src/proto.c
+++ b/src/proto.c
@@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ const struct proto_desc proto_inet_service = {
PROTO_LINK(IPPROTO_TCP, &proto_tcp),
PROTO_LINK(IPPROTO_DCCP, &proto_dccp),
PROTO_LINK(IPPROTO_SCTP, &proto_sctp),
+ PROTO_LINK(IPPROTO_ICMPV6, &proto_icmp6),
},
.templates = {
[0] = PROTO_META_TEMPLATE("l4proto", &inet_protocol_type, NFT_META_L4PROTO, 8),
--
2.10.2
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 18:54 Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-03-22 13:09 ` [PATCH nft] src: allow update of net base w. meta l4proto icmpv6 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-22 13:44 ` Florian Westphal
2017-03-22 15:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-22 15:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-22 15:44 ` Florian Westphal
2017-03-22 16:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-22 19:22 ` Florian Westphal
2017-03-24 11:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-24 12:21 ` Florian Westphal
2017-03-29 10:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170321185437.22959-1-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.