Re: Question regarding back compatibility for DT

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:27:37AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hi Rob, dt people,
> >
> > is it acceptable a driver is changed using a new DT binding but becomes
> > incompatible with the old DT files ?
> >
> > IOW, is it possible to change the DT and the driver without supporting the old
> > DT format, forcing an update of the DT and the kernel ?
> 
> If you want a global rule, then no it is not okay. However, it depends
> on the platform and it's users. I just ask that breaking compatibility
> and why is highlighted in the commit message and the platform
> maintainer is okay with it.

Thanks for the clarification. I will ask the maintainer if breaking the
compatibility is ok.

That shows how important is to wisely choose the right binding.

  -- Daniel


-- 

 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html