From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:45:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20170322154526.GA17123@kroah.com> References: <1488313833-12430-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: Dann Frazier , Manoj Iyer , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Christopher Covington List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > >> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44, > >> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0. > >> > >> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit") > >> > >> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer > >> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > > > > Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it > > up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you. > > Ok, how about 4.11-rc4? It's in the queue in tty-linus, right? If so, that should make it into 4.11-final. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greg@kroah.com (Greg Kroah-Hartman) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:45:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [v2][for 4.11]tty: acpi/spcr: QDF2400 E44 checks for wrong OEM revision In-Reply-To: References: <1488313833-12430-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20170322154526.GA17123@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13:00AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > >> For Qualcomm Technologies QDF2400 SOCs that are affected by erratum E44, > >> the ACPI oem_revision field is actually set to 1, not 0. > >> > >> Fixes: d8a4995bcea1 ("tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit") > >> > >> Tested-by: Manoj Iyer > >> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > > > > Greg, this is a critical fix for our platform. Can you please pick it > > up for 4.11-rc3? Thank you. > > Ok, how about 4.11-rc4? It's in the queue in tty-linus, right? If so, that should make it into 4.11-final. thanks, greg k-h