From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DEE19E00A0A; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:50:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com (fllnx209.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.16]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A706E0094C for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v2MJoYm4010229; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1490212234; bh=5W1mDLRnLibUU9/111qptGsbU3RSKyLi3BJvrcojnRo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=d5PYnB8gLCSayvbxpbjFXylp9koLHT1VzIyguEWnNTCidjqWKZNfLtBaY0ffznhwc ZmdvfpGqK/LJg75+ET4V+Xily16KX6z96p3qaZNKA0YWi8Lea6VZc5bCL04T9q4f4X YL/7WN41YfZzW5cBqTMgHSP6OO8MJ2OXz/wASSLE= Received: from DFLE73.ent.ti.com (dfle73.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.110]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2MJoTso018259; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:29 -0500 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DFLE73.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2MJoS9S010441; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:50:27 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Glenn Schmottlach Message-ID: <20170322195027.GB29187@edge> References: <20170320155459.GP14484@edge> <20170320201516.GD23524@edge> <20170320210801.GB24585@edge> <20170321174523.GA25961@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Trouble modifying defconfig for linux-ti-staging_rt recipe X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:50:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:41:22PM -0400, Glenn Schmottlach wrote: > > > > Looks good... Can you try moving your defconfig into "ti33x" folder? > > > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_%.bbappend > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt/ti33x/defconfig > > > > You're a genius! ;-) > > I moved the defconfig into a ti33x sub-directory and it appears > bitbake now uses my defconfig instead of the (default) one. So at > least now I have two approaches for configuring different kernel > options: replace the defconfig with my own or use fragments for > surgical strikes. > > Thanks so much for your help . . . You are welcome. It's interesting that file overrides are still in play and take precedence with bbappends... Need to keep that in mind. -- Denys