All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ti: clocks: Fix do_enable_clocks() to accept NULL pointers as input parameters
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:11:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324101112.3db53718@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acdac850-d58d-41c8-b0ea-298a18ac4c2f@ti.com>

Hi Lokesh,

> 
> 
> On 3/24/2017 3:54 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Up till this commit passing NULL as input parameter was allowed,
> > but not handled properly.
> > 
> > When one passed NULL to one of this function parameters, the code
> > was executed causing data abort.
> > 
> > However, what is more interesting, the abort was not caught because
> > of code execution in HYP mode with masked CPSR A bit ("Imprecise
> > Data Abort mask bit). The TI's AM57xx SoC switch to HYP mode with A
> > bit masked in lowlevel_init.S due to SMC call. Such operation (by
> > default) is performed in SoC ROM code.
> > 
> > The problem would pop up when one:
> > - Switch back to SVC mode after disabling LPAE support
> > - Somebody enables A bit (by executing cpsie a asm instruction)
> > 
> > and then the previously described exception would be caught.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c | 10 ++++++----
> 
> This has been moved to arch/arm/mach-omap2/clocks-common.c
> Please use the latest U-Boot.

Ok. I'm not working on a cutting-edge u-boot.

> 
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c index
> > 097b8e3..157155a 100644 ---
> > a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c +++
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/clocks-common.c @@ -822,27 +822,29
> > @@ void do_enable_clocks(u32 const *clk_domains, u32 i, max = 100;
> >  
> >  	/* Put the clock domains in SW_WKUP mode */
> > -	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains[i]; i++) {
> > +	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains && clk_domains[i];
> > i++) {
> 
> Instead of checking for clk_domains every time, can we use max as
> ARRAY_SIZE(clk_domains)?

do_enable_clocks() accepts pointer to u32 as an argument
(clk_domains). IMHO the ARRAY_SIZE(clk_domains) would be 1 - always.

> Similarly other places.
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Lokesh
> 
> >  		enable_clock_domain(clk_domains[i],
> >  				    CD_CLKCTRL_CLKTRCTRL_SW_WKUP);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Clock modules that need to be put in HW_AUTO */
> > -	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_modules_hw_auto[i]; i++) {
> > +	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_modules_hw_auto &&
> > +		     clk_modules_hw_auto[i]; i++) {
> >  		enable_clock_module(clk_modules_hw_auto[i],
> >  				    MODULE_CLKCTRL_MODULEMODE_HW_AUTO,
> >  				    wait_for_enable);
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	/* Clock modules that need to be put in SW_EXPLICIT_EN
> > mode */
> > -	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_modules_explicit_en[i]; i++) {
> > +	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_modules_explicit_en &&
> > +		     clk_modules_explicit_en[i]; i++) {
> >  		enable_clock_module(clk_modules_explicit_en[i],
> >  				    MODULE_CLKCTRL_MODULEMODE_SW_EXPLICIT_EN,
> >  				    wait_for_enable);
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	/* Put the clock domains in HW_AUTO mode now */
> > -	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains[i]; i++) {
> > +	for (i = 0; (i < max) && clk_domains && clk_domains[i];
> > i++) { enable_clock_domain(clk_domains[i],
> >  				    CD_CLKCTRL_CLKTRCTRL_HW_AUTO);
> >  	}
> > 




Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 22:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ti: clocks: Fix do_enable_clocks() to accept NULL pointers as input parameters Lukasz Majewski
2017-03-24  2:02 ` Lokesh Vutla
2017-03-24  9:11   ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2017-03-24  9:17     ` Lokesh Vutla
2017-03-27  8:15 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Majewski
2017-04-04 14:51   ` Tom Rini
2017-04-10 18:24   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324101112.3db53718@jawa \
    --to=lukma@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.