From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] q35 and sysbus devices
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:23:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324192318.GG28530@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_V3w6-WELX_M-jW1M=2TV7-wmEWa-c40ZmXLywC=+=Cg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:08:56PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 16:58, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> > "Sysbus" isn't a bus. In qdev's original design, every device had to
> > plug into a bus, period. The ones that really didn't were made to plug
> > into "sysbus".
> >
> > Pretty much the only thing "sysbus" devices had in common was that they
> > couldn't be used with device_add and device_del.
>
> This isn't really true. Sysbus devices support having MMIO regions
> and IRQ lines and GPIO lines. If you need those you're a
> sysbus device; otherwise you can probably just be a plain old Device.
>
> > We fixed the design to permit bus-less devices, but we didn't get rid of
> > "sysbus".
>
> Call it what you want, but we should have some common code support
> for "I want to have MMIOs and IRQs and GPIO lines". You could
> argue for moving all that into Device I suppose.
Even if we don't move all that into Device, this sounds like an
argument for the existence of struct SysBusDevice. But I still
don't understand the reason TYPE_SYSTEM_BUS still exists.
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 20:31 [Qemu-devel] q35 and sysbus devices Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-22 20:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-24 10:49 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-03-24 13:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-24 14:13 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-24 19:04 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-24 16:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 17:08 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-24 17:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:10 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-27 8:00 ` Thomas Huth
2017-03-24 19:23 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2017-03-27 8:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-03-27 9:00 ` Peter Maydell
2017-03-27 16:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-24 11:41 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170324192318.GG28530@thinpad.lan.raisama.net \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.