All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:05:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170327140507.GN10289@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490265163-29981-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

Hi,

On 23/03/17 19:32, Byungchul Park wrote:
> cpudl_find() is used to find a cpu having the latest dl. The function
> should return the latest cpu among ones satisfying task's affinity and
> dl constraint, but current code gives up immediately and just return
> fail when it fails at the test *only with* the maximum cpu.
> 
> For example:
> 
>    cpu 0 is running a task (dl: 10).
>    cpu 1 is running a task (dl: 9).
>    cpu 2 is running a task (dl: 8).
>    cpu 3 is running a task (dl: 2).
> 
>    where cpu 3 want to push a task (affinity is 1 2 3 and dl is 1).

Hummm, but this should only happen if you disable admission control,
right? Otherwise task's affinity can't be smaller that 0-3.

> 
> In this case, the task should be migrated from cpu 3 to cpu 1, and
> preempt cpu 1's task. However, current code just returns fail because
> it fails at the affinity test with the maximum cpu, that is, cpu 0.
> 
> This patch set tries to find the best among ones satisfying task's
> affinity and dl constraint until success or no more to see.
> 

Anyway, do you have numbers showing how common is you fail scenario?
It would be interesting to understand how much the slow path is actually
used, IMHO.

Thanks,

- Juri

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-27 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 10:32 [PATCH 0/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched/deadline: Re-define parameters of cpudl heapify functions Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched/deadline: Add cpudl_maximum_dl() for clean-up Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched/deadline: Factor out the selecting of suitable max cpu Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched/deadline: Protect read of cpudl heap with a lock Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched/deadline: Don't return meaningless cpu in cpudl_maximum_cpu() Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched/deadline: Factor out the modifying of cpudl's heap tree Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 22:36   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 22:35 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Byungchul Park
2017-03-27 14:05 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-03-28  0:42   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-28  7:11     ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-28  7:29       ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170327140507.GN10289@e106622-lin \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.