From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] get_nr_restart_syscall() should return __NR_ia32_restart_syscall if __USER32_CS
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328145413.GA3164@redhat.com> (raw)
Hello,
get_nr_restart_syscall() is still buggy, TS_I386_REGS_POKED can't
really help and should probably die.
The fix just adds the __USER32_CS check, but perhaps we can avoid
these "fundamentally broken" checks altogether?
Is __NR_ia32_restart_syscall/__NR_restart_syscall the part of ABI?
OK, we probaly can't remove them, at least right now. But what if
we simply add the new syscall number,
#define __NR_new_restart_syscall 383
#define __NR_ia32_new_restart_syscall 383
so that it doesn't depends on bitness and we can just do
static inline unsigned long get_nr_restart_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(__NR_ia32_new_restart_syscall != __NR_new_restart_syscall);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
return __NR_new_restart_syscall | (regs->orig_ax & __X32_SYSCALL_BIT);
#else
return __NR_new_restart_syscall;
#endif
}
?
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 14:54 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2017-03-28 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] get_nr_restart_syscall() should return __NR_ia32_restart_syscall if __USER32_CS Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-28 15:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-28 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-28 17:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-29 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 15:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 18:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-29 16:33 ` syscall_get_error() && TS_ checks Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 18:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 18:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 19:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 16:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170328145413.GA3164@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.