From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f199.google.com (mail-wr0-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B3C6B0390 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f199.google.com with SMTP id p64so51630170wrb.18 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d7si4012404wmi.91.2017.03.28.09.55.22 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:55:13 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Message-ID: <20170328165513.GC27446@linux-80c1.suse> References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Sorry, forgot to add Anshuman. On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently >winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the >value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting >it. Michal? > >Thanks, >Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755048AbdC1Qzf (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:55:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59708 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753649AbdC1Qze (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:55:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:55:13 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Message-ID: <20170328165513.GC27446@linux-80c1.suse> Mail-Followup-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, forgot to add Anshuman. On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently >winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the >value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting >it. Michal? > >Thanks, >Davidlohr