From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing handle_reread Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:10:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20170328171022.GZ10760@atomide.com> References: <20170322171052.7006-1-tony@atomide.com> <20170322171052.7006-2-tony@atomide.com> <20170327174952.jsfleql654m2h45i@sirena.org.uk> <20170328003648.GS10760@atomide.com> <20170328151849.uvj2ljkbts4cwksq@sirena.org.uk> <20170328154740.GW10760@atomide.com> <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Charles Keepax , Lee Jones , Marcel Partap , Michael Scott List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Mark Brown [170328 09:51]: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Mark Brown [170328 08:21]: > > > > Right, my thinking here is that by pushing into genirq we minimise the > > > need even further since it'll also be available to drivers not using > > > regmap-irq. > > > > > like, handle until we get IRQ_NONE? :) > > > > Well, that's what the per driver emulation does so... yeah. Probably > > > with an upper limit on the number of times we do that. > > > OK let's first see how that would work. I'll send a patch > > for that. > > Thanks. Can you keep me on the CC please? It's something I keep > thinking about looking at myself. Sure will do, you'll get some shared flames on it :) Regards, Tony