From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
To: jrnieder@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Subject: [PATCHv9 (6,7)/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329222616.11077-1-sbeller@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170328230938.9887-1-sbeller@google.com>
v9:
* This is a resend of the last two patches, i.e. these two patches apply
at 5c896f7c3ec (origin/sb/submodule-short-status^^)
* below is a diff of this patch series against origin/sb/submodule-short-status
* better tests, refined documentation, thanks for the review, Jonathan!
Thanks,
Stefan
previous work:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20170328230938.9887-1-sbeller@google.com/
Stefan Beller (2):
short status: improve reporting for submodule changes
submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in
is_submodule_modified
Documentation/git-status.txt | 13 +++++
submodule.c | 21 +++++++-
t/t3600-rm.sh | 18 +++++--
t/t7506-status-submodule.sh | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
wt-status.c | 17 ++++++-
5 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-status.txt b/Documentation/git-status.txt
index 01b457c322..d70abc6afe 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-status.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-status.txt
@@ -186,7 +186,11 @@ Submodules have more state and instead report
recorded in the index
m the submodule has modified content
? the submodule has untracked files
+since modified content or untracked files in a submodule cannot be added
+via `git add` in the superproject to prepare a commit.
+'m' and '?' are applied recursively. For example if a nested submodule
+in a submodule contains an untracked file, this is reported as '?' as well.
If -b is used the short-format status is preceded by a line
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 730cc9513a..3da65100e3 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1082,20 +1082,18 @@ unsigned is_submodule_modified(const char *path, int ignore_untracked)
if (buf.buf[0] == 'u' ||
buf.buf[0] == '1' ||
buf.buf[0] == '2') {
- /*
- * T XY SSSS:
- * T = line type, XY = status, SSSS = submodule state
- */
- if (buf.len < 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 4)
+ /* T = line type, XY = status, SSSS = submodule state */
+ if (buf.len < strlen("T XY SSSS"))
die("BUG: invalid status --porcelain=2 line %s",
buf.buf);
- /* regular unmerged and renamed files */
if (buf.buf[5] == 'S' && buf.buf[8] == 'U')
/* nested untracked file */
dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_UNTRACKED;
- if (memcmp(buf.buf + 5, "S..U", 4))
+ if (buf.buf[0] == 'u' ||
+ buf.buf[0] == '2' ||
+ memcmp(buf.buf + 5, "S..U", 4))
/* other change */
dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED;
}
diff --git a/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh b/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
index ab822c79e6..055c90736e 100755
--- a/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
+++ b/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ test_create_repo_with_commit () {
)
}
+sanitize_output () {
+ sed -e "s/$_x40/HASH/" -e "s/$_x40/HASH/" output >output2 &&
+ mv output2 output
+}
+
+
test_expect_success 'setup' '
test_create_repo_with_commit sub &&
echo output > .gitignore &&
@@ -311,6 +317,10 @@ test_expect_success 'diff --submodule with merge conflict in .gitmodules' '
test_cmp diff_submodule_actual diff_submodule_expect
'
+# We'll setup different cases for further testing:
+# sub1 will contain a nested submodule,
+# sub2 will have an untracked file
+# sub3 will have an untracked repository
test_expect_success 'setup superproject with untracked file in nested submodule' '
(
cd super &&
@@ -318,6 +328,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup superproject with untracked file in nested submodule'
rm .gitmodules &&
git submodule add -f ./sub1 &&
git submodule add -f ./sub2 &&
+ git submodule add -f ./sub1 sub3 &&
git commit -a -m "messy merge in superproject" &&
(
cd sub1 &&
@@ -327,13 +338,27 @@ test_expect_success 'setup superproject with untracked file in nested submodule'
git add sub1 &&
git commit -a -m "update sub1 to contain nested sub"
) &&
- echo untracked >super/sub1/sub2/untracked
+ echo content >super/sub1/sub2/file &&
+ echo content >super/sub2/file &&
+ git -C super/sub3 clone ../../sub2 untracked_repository
'
test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (porcelain)' '
git -C super status --porcelain >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
M sub1
+ M sub2
+ M sub3
+ EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (porcelain=2)' '
+ git -C super status --porcelain=2 >output &&
+ sanitize_output output &&
+ diff output - <<-\EOF
+ 1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
+ 1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub2
+ 1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub3
EOF
'
@@ -341,6 +366,41 @@ test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (short)' '
git -C super status --short >output &&
diff output - <<-\EOF
? sub1
+ ? sub2
+ ? sub3
+ EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup superproject with modified file in nested submodule' '
+ git -C super/sub1/sub2 add file &&
+ git -C super/sub2 add file
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (porcelain)' '
+ git -C super status --porcelain >output &&
+ diff output - <<-\EOF
+ M sub1
+ M sub2
+ M sub3
+ EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (porcelain=2)' '
+ git -C super status --porcelain=2 >output &&
+ sanitize_output output &&
+ diff output - <<-\EOF
+ 1 .M S.M. 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
+ 1 .M S.M. 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub2
+ 1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub3
+ EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status with added file in nested submodule (short)' '
+ git -C super status --short >output &&
+ diff output - <<-\EOF
+ m sub1
+ m sub2
+ ? sub3
EOF
'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 0:43 [PATCHv3 0/3] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 0:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 0:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-23 6:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 18:47 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 0:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] submodule.c, is_submodule_modified: stricter checking for submodules Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 0:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-23 0:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 1:06 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/8] submodule.c: use argv_array in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/8] submodule.c: convert is_submodule_modified to use strbuf_getwholeline_fd Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 4/8] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 5/8] submodule.c: factor out early loop termination in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] submodule.c: stricter checking for submodules " Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 21:11 ` [PATCH 0/8] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] submodule.c: use argv_array in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:36 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] submodule.c: convert is_submodule_modified to use strbuf_getwholeline_fd Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-23 23:04 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 23:11 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] submodule.c: factor out early loop termination in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] submodule.c: stricter checking for submodules " Stefan Beller
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] submodule.c: use argv_array in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 22:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] submodule.c: factor out early loop termination " Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 22:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] submodule.c: convert is_submodule_modified to use strbuf_getwholeline Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 22:38 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-25 0:12 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 22:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] submodule.c: stricter checking for submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 22:42 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 23:06 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-24 23:31 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-25 0:25 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] submodule.c: use argv_array in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] submodule.c: factor out early loop termination " Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] submodule.c: convert is_submodule_modified to use strbuf_getwholeline Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] submodule.c: port is_submodule_modified to use porcelain 2 Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] submodule.c: stricter checking for submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 0:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-27 21:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-28 1:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-30 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-28 21:20 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-25 1:35 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-28 23:09 ` [PATCH v8 " Stefan Beller
2017-03-28 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Stefan Beller
2017-03-28 23:24 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-28 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-28 23:42 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-29 22:00 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-29 22:26 ` Stefan Beller [this message]
2017-03-29 22:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] short status: improve reporting for submodule changes Stefan Beller
2017-03-29 23:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-29 22:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] submodule.c: correctly handle nested submodules in is_submodule_modified Stefan Beller
2017-03-29 23:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-30 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 22:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] " Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170329222616.11077-1-sbeller@google.com \
--to=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.