From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ѕd: split sd_setup_discard_cmnd
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:49:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330084943.GA12015@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170328140509.GA27578@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:05:09AM -0600, axboe@kernel.dk wrote:
> > Although I know this is an issue in the existing code and not something
> > introduced by you: please consider using logical_to_sectors() instead of
> > open-coding this function. Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.
>
> The downside of doing that is that we still call ilog2() twice, which
> sucks. Would be faster to cache ilog2(sector_size) and use that in the
> shift calculation.
I suspect that gcc is smart enough to optimize it away. That beeing said
while this looks like a nice cleanup this patch is just supposed to move
code, so I'd rather not add the change here and leave it for a separate
submission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-20 20:43 support ranges TRIM for libata Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] ѕd: split sd_setup_discard_cmnd Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 22:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-27 22:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-28 14:05 ` axboe
2017-03-30 8:49 ` hch [this message]
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] sd: provide a new ata trim provisioning mode Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 22:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-27 22:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] libata: remove SCT WRITE SAME support Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] libata: simplify the trim implementation Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: add a max_discard_segment_size queue limit Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 23:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-27 23:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] sd: support multi-range TRIM for ATA disks Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 23:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-27 23:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] sd: use ZERO_PAGE for WRITE_SAME payloads Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-27 23:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-27 23:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-03-21 18:59 ` support ranges TRIM for libata Tejun Heo
2017-03-22 18:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-23 13:47 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-23 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-23 14:35 ` James Bottomley
2017-03-23 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-23 15:04 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-23 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-23 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-23 15:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170330084943.GA12015@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.