All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	"linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Fix mmap() support
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:30:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330103032.35558cf3@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8BfJZDR5A5MRO0SOL7r5U+_7ETuVx_LH95J7K-ZRZe9EM=A@mail.gmail.com>

+Christoph who introduced the CONFIG_ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP option.

Hi Max,

On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:48:24 -0700
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > The xtensa architecture does not implement the dma_map_ops->mmap() hook,
> > thus relying on the default dma_common_mmap() implementation.
> > This implementation is only safe on DMA-coherent architecture (hence the
> > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP) condition), but xtensa does not
> > fall in this case.  
> 
> Why not? AFAIU "DMA-coherent" may mean "having DMA memory accessible
> w/o caching", is that right?

I think I misunderstood what CONFIG_ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP means.
My understanding was that, if CONFIG_ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP is not
set, the architecture is assumed to be cache-coherent, but re-reading
the option name I realize you're probably right.

> We have all low memory mapped in the uncached
> KSEG region, it may be mapped to the userspace w/o caching as well, that's
> what dma_common_mmap does.
> 
> > This lead to bad pfn calculation when someone tries to mmap() one or
> > several pages that are not part of the identity mapping because the
> > dma_common_mmap() extract the pfn value from the virt address using
> > virt_to_page() which is only applicable on DMA-coherent platforms (on
> > other platforms, DMA coherent pages are mapped in a different region).  
> 
> Oh, yes. Our __pa implementation is buggy in a sense that it doesn't work
> correctly with addresses from the uncached KSEG.

I'm new to the xtensa architecture, and on ARM, virt_to_phys(), __pa()
and co are known to be unsafe when used on DMA-coherent memory.
Here it seems that you have twice the identity mapping in your virtual
address space: once with the uncached flag set, and another one with
cache activated, so it is indeed easier to patch __pa() to do the right
thing.

> 
> > Implement xtensa_dma_mmap() (loosely based on __arm_dma_mmap()) in which
> > pfn is extracted from the DMA address using PFN_DOWN().
> >
> > While we're at it, select ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP from the XTENSA
> > entry so that we never silently fallback to dma_common_mmap() if someone
> > decides to drop the xtensa_dma_mmap() implementation.  
> 
> I don't think this is right.

Yep, as said above, you're probably right.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > This bug has been detected while developping a DRM driver on an FPGA
> > containing an Xtensa CPU. The DRM driver is using the generic CMA GEM
> > implementation which is allocating DMA coherent buffers in kernel space
> > and then allows userspace programs to mmap() these buffers.
> >
> > Whith the existing implementation, the userspace pointer was pointing
> > to a completely different physical region, thus leading to bad display
> > output and memory corruptions.
> >
> > I'm not sure the xtensa_dma_mmap() implementation is correct, but it
> > seems to solve my problem.
> >
> > Don't hesitate to propose a different implementation.  
> 
> Could you please instead check if the dma_common_mmap works for you
> with the attached patch?

I will. BTW, shouldn't it be

	if (off >= XCHAL_KSEG_SIZE)

instead of

	if (off > XCHAL_KSEG_SIZE)
?

> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > index 70e362e6038e..8f3ef49ceba6 100644
> > --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > @@ -249,9 +249,32 @@ int xtensa_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int xtensa_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                          void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> > +                          unsigned long attrs)
> > +{
> > +       int ret = -ENXIO;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > +       unsigned long nr_vma_pages = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +       unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +       unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(dma_addr);
> > +       unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff;
> > +
> > +       if (dma_mmap_from_coherent(dev, vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret))
> > +               return ret;
> > +
> > +       if (off < nr_pages && nr_vma_pages <= (nr_pages - off))
> > +               ret = remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn + off,
> > +                                     vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
> > +                                     vma->vm_page_prot);  
> 
> You use vma->vm_page_prot directly here, isn't it required to do
> 
> vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
> 
> to make the mapping uncached? Because otherwise I guess you
> get a mapping with cache which on Xtensa is not going to be
> coherent.

Indeed. Anyway, we'll probably keep relying on dma_common_mmap() which
is already doing the right thing.

Thanks for the review.

Regards,

Boris

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28  8:20 [PATCH] xtensa: Fix mmap() support Boris Brezillon
2017-03-29 22:48 ` Max Filippov
2017-03-30  8:30   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-03-30  8:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-30  9:05     ` Max Filippov
2017-03-30 10:05       ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170330103032.35558cf3@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.