diff for duplicates of <20170404092604.GB14898@arm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index f5066b4..8fb133b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:44:04AM +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
 > 
 > I've heard it suggested that 'MiB' would confuse people who have never
 > seen it before. And that it was ugly. Those arguments were fairly
-> specious when they were first made, and they're even sillier now — more
+> specious when they were first made, and they're even sillier now ? more
 > than 20 years since the binary prefixes were introduced.
 > 
 > The alleged confusion, and the perceived ugliness, are purely due to
@@ -39,8 +39,3 @@ David, since you seem to be the most outraged, fancy sending a patch? ;)
 Alternatively, who fancies burning some dictionaries?
 
 Will
-
-_______________________________________________
-kexec mailing list
-kexec@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 8819adf..6c58ccb 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,23 +5,10 @@
  "ref\0e275e8c8b8d81d97b6a28b860820a27c.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org\0"
  "ref\020170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org\0"
  "ref\01491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org\0"
- "From\0Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v34 04/14] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel\0"
+ "From\0will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH v34 04/14] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:26:04 +0100\0"
- "To\0David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>\0"
- "Cc\0mark.rutland@arm.com"
-  panand@redhat.com
-  ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
-  geoff@infradead.org
-  catalin.marinas@arm.com
-  kexec@lists.infradead.org
-  AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
-  james.morse@arm.com
-  Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
-  bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com
-  sgoel@codeaurora.org
-  dyoung@redhat.com
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Guys, we were supposed to stop discussing this three days ago.\n"
@@ -42,7 +29,7 @@
  "> \n"
  "> I've heard it suggested that 'MiB' would confuse people who have never\n"
  "> seen it before. And that it was ugly. Those arguments were fairly\n"
- "> specious when they were first made, and they're even sillier now \342\200\224 more\n"
+ "> specious when they were first made, and they're even sillier now ? more\n"
  "> than 20 years since the binary prefixes were introduced.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> The alleged confusion, and the perceived ugliness, are purely due to\n"
@@ -64,11 +51,6 @@
  "\n"
  "Alternatively, who fancies burning some dictionaries?\n"
  "\n"
- "Will\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "kexec mailing list\n"
- "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
+ Will
 
-e81488324cda3268671bb38c7b5f9d842a59829f107e34297c386eda2bbae887
+b88daab07425caede7ab8441cf2cf1a3d391576b849889aae9626578c097c543
