All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>
Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libxt_hashlimit: fix 64-bit printf formats
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:00:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170411070019.GA2180@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1704101749480.27401@n3.vanv.qr>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 05:59:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Saturday 2017-04-08 22:29, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static uint64_t parse_burst(const char *burst, int revision)
> >>  	if (v > max)
> >>  		xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, "bad value for option "
> >>  			"\"--hashlimit-burst\", value \"%s\" too large "
> >> -				"(max %lumb).", burst, max/1024/1024);
> >> +				"(max %" PRIu64 "mb).", burst, max/1024/1024);
> >                                        ^      ^
> >
> >I can remove this whitespaces, right?
> 
> With my distro hat on:
> 
> Clumping these together like "foo"BAR"baz" has already caused compile failures
> in the broader scope of distributions (thousands of packages) because languages
> introduced new tokenization rules. Admittedly, this occurred in C++ (namely,
> user-defined string literals), but it does show that tokens which logically are
> separate should stay separate.

Existing code doesn't add space, so I would like we don't introduce
inconsistencies.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-07 11:47 [PATCH iptables] extensions: libxt_hashlimit: fix 64-bit printf formats James Cowgill
2017-04-07 12:17 ` Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2017-04-08 20:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-04-10  9:38   ` James Cowgill
2017-04-10 15:59   ` Jan Engelhardt
2017-04-11  7:00     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170411070019.GA2180@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=James.Cowgill@imgtec.com \
    --cc=jengelh@inai.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.