All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] handle tsc_tolerance during migration between identical hosts
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:39:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170411093938.GA25549@aepfle.de> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3187 bytes --]

Testing has shown that domUs with 'tsc_mode=default' can be migrated
safely between identical hardware, even if the measured clock frequency
differs by a few kHz. A change like shown below would allow to migrate
between "2.nnGHz" hosts without enforcing emulation. If the domU is
migrated to a host with "2.mmGHz" the frequency jump might have bad
effects, and tsc emulation might be good even if it comes with a
perfromance penalty.

The change below adds a new boot option to set a tolerance value.
I think its up to the host admin to decide, therefore a global option
should be enough.

Any opinions, also on the name of the cmdline option?


Olaf


--- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
 static char __initdata opt_clocksource[10];
 string_param("clocksource", opt_clocksource);
 
+static unsigned int __read_mostly opt_tsc_tolerance;
+integer_param("tsc_tolerance", opt_tsc_tolerance);
+
 unsigned long __read_mostly cpu_khz;  /* CPU clock frequency in kHz. */
 DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rtc_lock);
 unsigned long pit0_ticks;
@@ -1882,6 +1885,8 @@ void tsc_set_info(struct domain *d,
                   uint32_t tsc_mode, uint64_t elapsed_nsec,
                   uint32_t gtsc_khz, uint32_t incarnation)
 {
+    uint32_t khz_diff, tolerated;
+    printk(XENLOG_WARNING "%s: %u %x %lx %x %x\n", __func__, d->domain_id, tsc_mode, (unsigned long)elapsed_nsec, gtsc_khz, incarnation);
     if ( is_idle_domain(d) || is_hardware_domain(d) )
     {
         d->arch.vtsc = 0;
@@ -1924,6 +1929,15 @@ void tsc_set_info(struct domain *d,
         d->arch.vtsc_offset = get_s_time() - elapsed_nsec;
         d->arch.tsc_khz = gtsc_khz ?: cpu_khz;
         set_time_scale(&d->arch.vtsc_to_ns, d->arch.tsc_khz * 1000);
+        khz_diff = 0;
+        if (gtsc_khz)
+            khz_diff = cpu_khz > gtsc_khz ? cpu_khz - gtsc_khz : gtsc_khz - cpu_khz;
+        if (opt_tsc_tolerance) {
+            tolerated = khz_diff <= opt_tsc_tolerance;
+        } else {
+            tolerated = d->arch.tsc_khz == cpu_khz;
+        }
+        printk("%s: d%u: dom0 has %lu kHz, domU expects %u kHz, difference of %u is %s tolerance of %u. (HVM scaling ratio: %llu)\n", __func__, d->domain_id, cpu_khz, gtsc_khz, khz_diff, tolerated ? "within" : "outside", opt_tsc_tolerance, has_hvm_container_domain(d) ? hvm_get_tsc_scaling_ratio(d->arch.tsc_khz) : 0 );
         /*
          * In default mode use native TSC if the host has safe TSC and:
          *  HVM/PVH: host and guest frequencies are the same (either
@@ -1931,10 +1945,8 @@ void tsc_set_info(struct domain *d,
          *  PV: guest has not migrated yet (and thus arch.tsc_khz == cpu_khz)
          */
         if ( tsc_mode == TSC_MODE_DEFAULT && host_tsc_is_safe() &&
-             (has_hvm_container_domain(d) ?
-              (d->arch.tsc_khz == cpu_khz ||
-               hvm_get_tsc_scaling_ratio(d->arch.tsc_khz)) :
-              incarnation == 0) )
+             (tolerated ||
+             (has_hvm_container_domain(d) && hvm_get_tsc_scaling_ratio(d->arch.tsc_khz))) )
         {
     case TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE:
             d->arch.vtsc = 0;

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11  9:39 Olaf Hering [this message]
2017-04-11 10:00 ` [PATCH RFC] handle tsc_tolerance during migration between identical hosts Jan Beulich
2017-04-18  9:50   ` Olaf Hering
2017-04-18 10:21     ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-19  7:46       ` Olaf Hering
2017-04-19  8:08         ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-11 10:10 ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170411093938.GA25549@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.