From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, slp@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:14:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412041426.GC16464@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170411192644.2131.68702.stgit@gimli.home>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:28:06PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> If the mmap_sem is contented then the vfio type1 IOMMU backend will
> defer locked page accounting updates to a workqueue task. This has a
> few problems and depending on which side the user tries to play, they
> might be over-penalized for unmaps that haven't yet been accounted or
> race the workqueue to enter more mappings than they're allowed. The
> original intent of this workqueue mechanism seems to be focused on
> reducing latency through the ioctl, but we cannot do so at the cost
> of correctness. Remove this workqueue mechanism and update the
> callers to allow for failure. We can also now recheck the limit under
> write lock to make sure we don't exceed it.
>
> vfio_pin_pages_remote() also now necessarily includes an unwind path
> which we can jump to directly if the consecutive page pinning finds
> that we're exceeding the user's memory limits. This avoids the
> current lazy approach which does accounting and mapping up to the
> fault, only to return an error on the next iteration to unwind the
> entire vfio_dma.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 19:28 [PATCH v3] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson
2017-04-12 4:14 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2017-04-12 12:05 ` Auger Eric
2017-04-14 19:21 ` Kirti Wankhede
2017-04-14 20:58 ` Alex Williamson
2017-04-14 22:00 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412041426.GC16464@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.